Annex C
Who is submitting the proposal?
|
Directorate:
|
Customer & Communities |
|||
|
Service Area:
|
Customer and Exchequer Services |
|||
|
Name of the proposal :
|
Council Tax Hardship Fund |
|||
|
Lead officer:
|
David Walker |
|||
|
Date assessment completed:
|
|
|||
|
Names of those who contributed to the assessment : |
||||
|
Name |
Job title |
Organisation |
Area of expertise |
|
|
Susan Wood |
Welfare Benefits & Strategic Partnership Manager |
CYC |
Welfare Benefits |
|
|
Paul Sanderson |
Income Manager |
CYC |
Council Tax |
|
|
Advice York |
N/A |
Advice York |
Welfare Benefits |
|
Step 1 – Aims and intended outcomes
|
1.1 |
What is the purpose of the proposal? Please explain your proposal in Plain English avoiding acronyms and jargon. |
|
|
To provide additional council tax support to those residents already in receipt of council tax supports (CTS) during 2023/24. |
|
1.2 |
Are there any external considerations? (Legislation/government directive/codes of practice etc.) |
|
|
This is a government scheme aimed at supporting council tax for those in receipt of CTS |
|
1.3 |
Who are the stakeholders and what are their interests? |
|
|
All residents in the city in receipt of CTS |
|
1.4 |
What results/outcomes do we want to achieve and for whom? This section should explain what outcomes you want to achieve for service users, staff and/or the wider community. Demonstrate how the proposal links to the Council Plan (2019- 2023) and other corporate strategies and plans. |
|
|
To provide financial support to those residents in the city on low income with their 2023/24 council tax bill.
|
Step 2 – Gathering the information and feedback
|
2.1 |
What sources of data, evidence and consultation feedback do we have to help us understand the impact of the proposal on equality rights and human rights? Please consider a range of sources, including: consultation exercises, surveys, feedback from staff, stakeholders, participants, research reports, the views of equality groups, as well your own experience of working in this area etc. |
|
|
Source of data/supporting evidence |
Reason for using |
|
|
Council Tax Support Records
|
Target resident group |
|
|
Income based benefit data |
Indicates financial vulnerability |
|
|
Advice York Partners
|
Stakeholder feedback |
|
|
|
|
|
Step 3 – Gaps in data and knowledge
|
3.1 |
What are the main gaps in information and understanding of the impact of your proposal? Please indicate how any gaps will be dealt with. |
|
|
Gaps in data or knowledge |
Action to deal with this |
|
|
There are no gaps in data knowledge as the target residents are already know to us. It is however possible other residents are entitled to CTS and have never claimed. |
The scheme will be publicised and shared with third sector partners. The council website, CT bills and DWP all encourage residents with liability for CT to claims CTS. |
|
|
|
|
|
Step 4 – Analysing the impacts or effects.
|
4.1 |
Please consider what the evidence tells you about the likely impact (positive or negative) on people sharing a protected characteristic, i.e. how significant could the impacts be if we did not make any adjustments? Remember the duty is also positive – so please identify where the proposal offers opportunities to promote equality and/or foster good relations. |
|||
|
Equality Groups and Human Rights. |
Key Findings/Impacts |
Positive (+) Negative (-) Neutral (0) |
High (H) Medium (M) Low (L) |
|
|
Age |
Will provide additional financial support to pay council tax for qualifying residents. |
0 |
L |
|
|
Disability
|
Will provide additional financial to pay council tax for qualifying residents. |
0 |
L |
|
|
Gender
|
Will provide additional financial support to pay council tax for qualifying residents. |
0 |
L |
|
|
Gender Reassignment |
Will provide additional financial support to pay council tax for qualifying residents. |
0 |
L |
|
|
Marriage and civil partnership |
n/a |
|
|
|
|
Pregnancy and maternity |
Will provide additional financial support to pay council tax for qualifying residents. |
0 |
L |
|
|
Race |
Will provide additional financial support to pay council tax for qualifying residents. |
0 |
L |
|
|
Religion and belief |
n/a |
|
|
|
|
Sexual orientation |
n/a |
|
|
|
|
Other Socio-economic groups including : |
Could other socio-economic groups be affected e.g. carers, ex-offenders, low incomes? |
|
||
|
Carer |
Will provide additional financial support to pay council tax for qualifying residents. |
+ |
L |
|
|
Low income groups |
Will provide additional financial support to pay council tax for qualifying residents. |
+ |
L |
|
|
Veterans, Armed Forces Community |
Will provide additional financial support to pay council tax for qualifying residents. |
+ |
L |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on human rights: |
|
|
||
|
List any human rights impacted. |
n/a |
|
|
|
Use the following guidance to inform your responses:
Indicate:
- Where you think that the proposal could have a POSITIVE impact on any of the equality groups like promoting equality and equal opportunities or improving relations within equality groups
- Where you think that the proposal could have a NEGATIVE impact on any of the equality groups, i.e. it could disadvantage them
- Where you think that this proposal has a NEUTRAL effect on any of the equality groups listed below i.e. it has no effect currently on equality groups.
It is important to remember that a proposal may be highly relevant to one aspect of equality and not relevant to another.
|
High impact (The proposal or process is very equality relevant) |
There is significant potential for or evidence of adverse impact The proposal is institution wide or public facing The proposal has consequences for or affects significant numbers of people The proposal has the potential to make a significant contribution to promoting equality and the exercise of human rights.
|
|
Medium impact (The proposal or process is somewhat equality relevant) |
There is some evidence to suggest potential for or evidence of adverse impact The proposal is institution wide or cross-Unit, but mainly internal The proposal has consequences for or affects some people The proposal has the potential to make a contribution to promoting equality and the exercise of human rights
|
|
Low impact (The proposal or process might be equality relevant) |
There is little evidence to suggest that the proposal could result in adverse impact The proposal operates in a limited way The proposal has consequences for or affects few people The proposal may have the potential to contribute to promoting equality and the exercise of human rights
|
Step 5 - Mitigating adverse impacts and maximising positive impacts
|
5.1 |
Based on your findings, explain ways you plan to mitigate any unlawful prohibited conduct or unwanted adverse impact. Where positive impacts have been identified, what is been done to optimise opportunities to advance equality or foster good relations? |
|
There are no adverse impacts of the support the benefit to all groups is a financial one where they qualify. The key group are those on low income in any of the categories within the EIA.
|
|
Step 6 – Recommendations and conclusions of the assessment
|
6.1 |
Having considered the potential or actual impacts you should be in a position to make an informed judgement on what should be done. In all cases, document your reasoning that justifies your decision. There are four main options you can take: |
|
|
- No major change to the proposal – the EIA demonstrates the proposal is robust. There is no potential for unlawful discrimination or adverse impact and you have taken all opportunities to advance equality and foster good relations, subject to continuing monitor and review. |
||
- Adjust the proposal – the EIA identifies potential problems or missed opportunities. This involves taking steps to remove any barriers, to better advance quality or to foster good relations.
- Continue with the proposal (despite the potential for adverse impact) – you should clearly set out the justifications for doing this and how you believe the decision is compatible with our obligations under the duty
- Stop and remove the proposal – if there are adverse effects that are not justified and cannot be mitigated, you should consider stopping the proposal altogether. If a proposal leads to unlawful discrimination it should be removed or changed.
Important: If there are any adverse impacts you cannot mitigate, please provide a compelling reason in the justification column. |
||
|
Option selected |
Conclusions/justification |
|
|
Continue with the proposal
|
This is a central government scheme that provides financial support to low income families, including pensioners and other residents in the city who meet the qualifying criteria with their council tax bill in 2023/24. |
|
Step 7 – Summary of agreed actions resulting from the assessment
|
7.1 |
What action, by whom, will be undertaken as a result of the impact assessment. |
|||
|
Impact/issue |
Action to be taken |
Person responsible |
Timescale |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Step 8 - Monitor, review and improve
|
8. 1 |
How will the impact of your proposal be monitored and improved upon going forward? Consider how will you identify the impact of activities on protected characteristics and other marginalised groups going forward? How will any learning and enhancements be capitalised on and embedded? |
|
|
N/A
|